Actually as a Cardinal of heretical Anti-Pope Paul VI, this alone is sufficient to prove the invalidity of his election.Sign of Contradiction, Foreword to the American Edition by John Krol: Cardinal Wojtyla preached the annual Lenten Retreat in March 1976 to Pope Paul VI and his co-workers. The full text of the twenty-two conferences delivered during the retreat are presented in this volume under the original title of "Sign of Contradiction."Canon 2203: If the offender foresaw the infraction of the law and nevertheless, neglected to use those precautions which any prudent person would have employed, the guilt is practically equivalent to deliberate violation of the law. By his silence, Montini therefore participated in Wojtyla's heresies listed below, since this was a retreat given to him.Sign of Contradiction, page 40: Forty days after the Nativity the Church celebrates an event full of spiritual significance. On that day the Son of God, as a tiny child of poor parents, born in a rough out-house in Bethlehem, was carried into the temple in Jerusalem. (Emphasis Mine)Sign of Contradiction, page 16: This God is professed in his silence by the Trappist or the Camaldolite. It is to him that the desert Bedouin turns at his hour for prayer. And perhaps the Buddhist too, wrapt in contemplation as he purifies his thought preparing the way for Nirvana.This is Modernism, condemned by Pope Pius X: Here it is well to note at once that, given this doctrine of experience united with the other doctrine of symbolism, every religion, even that of paganism, must be held to be true. (And this is what Wojtyla is implying, when we says that God is professed by the Trappist, the Camoldolite, the Bedouin (Moslem) and the Buddhist) What is to prevent such experience to be met with in every religion? In fact that they are to be found is asserted by not a few. And with what right will Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam? With what right can they claim true experiences for Catholics alone? Indeed Modernists do not deny but actually admit, some confusedly, others in the most open manner, that all religions are true. Now the religious sentiment, although it may be more perfect or less perfect, is always one and the same; and the intellectual formula, in order to be true, has but to respond to religious sentiment and to the Believer, whatever be the intellectual capacity of the latter. In the conflict between different religions, the most that Modernists can maintain is that the Catholic has more truth because it is more living and that is deserves with more reason the name of Christian because it corresponds more fully to the dogma of Christianity.The Making of the Popes 1978, page 208, quoting Karol Wojtyla from the Second Vatican Council: The church should so speak that the world may see that it is not only teaching but also seeking a just solution to human problems … helping the world find the solutions by itself and excluding an ecclesiastical mentality; lamentations over the wretched state of the world … moralizing and exhorting are to be avoided. (Omissions omitted in the original)Matthew 10:32-33: Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. Isn’t Wojtyla saying that we should deny the moral law given to us by Christ and let the world work out their own moral law. Isn’t this denying Jesus?And There Are Many Other Things
These heresies are presented to demonstrate that these four men (i.e. Roncalli, Montini, Luciani and Wojtyla) were not papabile, that is they were incapable of being elected Pope. Many other heresies have been connected with these men. Just as mortal sin is contrary to charity, so is disbelief in one article contrary to faith. Now charity does not remain in a man after one mortal sin. Therefore neither does faith, after a man disbelieves one article of faith. (Saint Thomas in the Summa, II-II Q5 A3) I answer that, neither living nor lifeless faith remains in a heretic who disbelieves one article of faith. Therefore we must conclude that to reject one article of faith is to reject faith itself.Michael Fighting
"Michael…who standeth for…thy people," — Dan. 12:1-12
