Michael Fighting
"Michael…who standeth for…thy people," — Dan. 12:1-12
Transelementation Versus Transsubtantiation
From the Encyclical of Paul VI, Mysterium Fidei, September 3, 1965, the Feast of Saint Pius X (who probably rolled over in his grave this day, because of this blasphemous Encyclical: This is why the Fathers felt they had a solemn duty to warn the faithful that, in reflecting upon this most sacred Sacrament, they should not pay attention to the senses, which report only the properties of bread and wine, but rather to the words of Christ, which have power great enough to change, transform, "transelementize" the bread and wine into His body and blood (Caps omitted in the original.) What is Paul 6 trying to say, by eschewing the traditional trem transubstantiate to indicate a change in substance and inventing a new term transelementize? The dictionary has no definition for this term. The prefix trans- means: so as to change thoroughly. The best definition of element appears to be a component, feature, or principle of somthing; basic part. And the suffix -ize means: to cause to become. So to transelementize is to cause the basic parts to be changed thoroughly. This is at best unclear; at worst, heretical.So in the Novus Ordo Missae, instead of transsubstantiating the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, these are transelementized. More modern theologians now use the term transsignification, indicating that the bread and wine become more signficant after the consecration at the Novus Ordo. Note in the decrees from the Pog Church often captilization is omitted where it should be used. These are produced exactly as foud in official books of the Pog Church.
