Holy Spirit
From The Great Revolt a chapter in Will the Catholic Church Survive the Twentieth Century?: Before leaving this section, we wish to examine the Novus Ordo rites, since there has been much confusion and obsfucation concerning their true nature and validity. We will prove that these rites are invalid, rite by rite, but we would first like to point out that one word, if used with knowledge of its New Age meaning and signification would invalidate every sacrament, every act (in recitation of prayers, or use of sacramentals), in which it appears. This word is "Holy Spirit," the Montinian substitute for "Holy Ghost." In the Montinian rites, "Holy "Spirit" replaces the Blessed Trinity in Confirmation, is mentioned in Baptism, and forgives sins in Penance. This ubiquitous spirit "gives grace" in Extreme Unction, and "holiness" in Holy Orders. In episcopal consecration, he is asked to enter the bishops as he entered the apostles on Pentecost. This "spirit" does not act as our Holy Ghost acts, and indeed, he is the antithesis of our Holy Ghost. This use of spirit in these rites is frighteningly akin to the New Age belief in spiritism, spirit guides, etc... In her already much quoted book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbows, Constance Cumbey even describes the New Age replacement for the Trinity--something New Agers call the "Solar Trinity" or "Logii." In this evil trinity, the father is described as will, the son, "love-wisdom," and "the holy-spirit" as "active intelligence"! This is the error of rationalism, the elevation of man's reason to the heights of deity itself; the "man as a god" teaching of Montini, Roncalli, and their successors!This unholy trinity is but an echo of Cabbalism, for Victor Marsden in his The Protocols of Zion, tell us "Cabbalists affirm that man is formed of three main invisible parts; namely, mind ... soul ... and lower soul or subconscience, which governs directly the material body." Marsden tell us that the "mind" has its seat in the brain, the "soul" in the heart, and the "lower soul" in the liver. (Protocols, p. 233.)
Thus, the New Age "trinity" can be seen to correspond with the Cabbalistic concept of man-god, the father being that lower consciousness, or will, which governs directly the body; the son being the heart or love-wisdom, and the holy spirit, the mind or brain, center of all active intelligence. The Cabbala is a book of Jewish occultism. Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines cabbala as: (1) A kind of system of occult theosophy or mystical interpretation of the Scriptures among Jewish rabbis; (2) Secret or esoteric doctrine. Reverend Denis Fahey has amply proven that the Jewish nation is the force behind masonry. Fahey writes: "This revolutionary deification of human nature ... has been called Rationalism or Naturalism ...Masonry is ... a naturalistic society ... which claims to make men good and true independently of the supernatural life...." (Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, p. 27.)
In addition to their "Solar Trinity," New Agers worship one S. Sanat Kumara as God, which name is only a thinly disguised scrambling of Satan. New Agers call him also "...the eternal youth from the planet Venus." From Dom Orchard's A Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture, we learn that Venus is equated with Lucifer, "the morningstar." New Agers Blavatsky, Bailey, and Benjamin Creme unabashedly admit that this "S. Sanat Kumara" is their "God," the "Ancient of Days." (Hidden Dangers, p. 67-68.) As we learned in an earlier section, Madame Blavatsky can be rightly called the mother of Theosophy. Theosophy and rationalism have both been condemned by the Vatican Council (DZ 1803, 1804, 1805, 1810), as well as Pope St. Pius X's encyclical, Pascendi.
What does "spirit" mean to the minister in "baptism" and in all the other Montinian rites? If spirit is used in the context of its New Age definition, or if it is understood to mean ANYTHING other than what the Church intends it to mean, the intention is absent, and the sacrament invalid. In defining what role intention plays in the validity of the sacraments, Pope Leo taught in "Apostolica Curae": "...if the rite is changed with the manifest purpose of introducing another rite ... not accepted by The Church, and of repudiating that which the Church does, and that which by Christ's institution belongs to the nature of the sacrament, then it is obvious that not only is the intention necessary for the sacrament absent, but also that an intention is present which is contrary and opposed to it." (Translation by G.D. Smith, London, 1946, p. 2.)
No rite aimed at the worship of man as his own God can possibly be admitted as valid by the Church; nor can it be said that any who followed Montini are or were capable of convecting his rites validly.
Michael Fighting
